2 Republicans challenge Minnesota plan for late mail ballots

Published 9:52 am Thursday, September 24, 2020

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A Republican state representative and a GOP activist are challenging an agreement to accept mail-in ballots in Minnesota that arrive up to a week after the November election, adding to the nationwide legal fight over voting rules before the presidential election.

Rep. Eric Lucero and Ramsey County activist James Carson, who both participate in the Electoral College, filed the lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court. The lawsuit states the agreement by Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat, violates federal law establishing Nov. 3 as the date of the 2020 election.

Simon agreed to extend the deadline because of a legal challenge by groups who sought to allay concerns about voter safety during the coronavirus pandemic and ease mail-in voting requirements. State election officials agreed to accept mail-in ballots arriving a week late, even if they don’t have a postmark, the Star Tribune reported.

Email newsletter signup

The Republicans’ lawsuit said the agreement violates the constitutional requirement that Congress sets the times of presidential elections and that state legislatures set the manner.

“This agreement threatens the integrity of the upcoming election, will result in widespread and severe vote dilution, will (at a minimum) create substantial uncertainty and delay over Minnesota’s ability to certify its results,” the lawsuit said.

Simon’s office declined to comment on the suit, which is backed by the conservative-leaning Honest Elections Project, a national advocacy group that says it’s working to guard against election fraud.

In a similar case in Wisconsin, the Republican-controlled Legislature on Wednesday appealed a federal court ruling that allows for absentee ballots to be counted up to six days after the Nov. 3 election in the battleground state.

Wisconsin law requires absentee ballots to be returned by 8 p.m. on Election Day. But Democrats argued that given challenges posed by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, along with the anticipated large number of absentee ballots, the deadline ought to be extended.