Archived Story

Sparks, Poppe wait on gay marriage stance, urge budget action

Published 9:59am Thursday, February 28, 2013

After lawmakers formally launched a long-anticipated effort Wednesday to legalize gay marriage in Minnesota by summer, local legislators are waiting to hear from constituents before taking a stance.

Rep. Jeanne Poppe, DFL-Austin, said Wednesday night she hadn’t seen the bill in question, but she agreed with top DFL officials that Minnesota’s economic issues should take precedence over social issues like gay marriage.

“I would agree that our priorities need to be to balance the budget,” she said.

Poppe said she’s open to gay marriage but she’d like to hear from local residents before throwing her support one way or the other.

Sen. Dan Sparks, DFL-Austin, agreed legislators should be more concerned about Minnesota’s fiscal situation before tackling issues like gay marriage.

“We need to remain focused, and our No. 1 priority should be balancing the state’s budget,” he said Thursday morning.

Sparks said he would listen to a gay marriage proposal, but he would take into account local voters, a majority of whom voted to support an amendment banning gay marriage in the last election.

Gay couples and their small children crowded the kickoff news conference Wednesday — a visual reminder that family diversity exists in the state but is not recognized by its laws.

Arguing that such families deserve the same recognition from the state as more traditional ones, sponsors of the gay marriage bill aim to repeal Minnesota’s 1997 law that prohibited marriage between couples of the same sex. The bill exempts churches from being forced to perform same-sex weddings.

“We’re a family in the eyes of God,” Michael Adam Latz, a Minneapolis rabbi raising two daughters with his male partner. “But right here in my home state of Minnesota, the place where I was born, where we live, work, pay taxes and raise our children, we are legal strangers.”

Gay marriage supporters point to last fall’s defeat of the constitutional gay marriage ban as the starting point for what they hope is a final push to legalize it. Gov. Mark Dayton has said he would sign the bill if it reaches his desk; if that happens, same-sex weddings would commence on Aug. 1.

But Republicans opposed to gay marriage said supporters got the wrong message from defeat of the marriage amendment.

“The people simply said they didn’t want to take the definition of marriage as it’s written in Minnesota state law, and include that in the constitution,” said Sen. Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove.

The bill would change Minnesota’s current statutory definition of marriage from “a civil contract between a man and a woman” to “between two people.” The bill would exempt churches from being forced to perform same-sex weddings.

“Communities of conscience and others in Minnesota who may disagree with this bill won’t be compelled to do anything, won’t be required to violate their own conscience,” said Rep. Steve Simon, DFL-St. Louis Park, a co-sponsor of the bill.

But Sen. Dan Hall, a Burnsville Republican and a pastor, said he worried that exemption could be lifted in future legislative sessions. “I will personally go to jail before I ever perform a marriage for a homosexual,” Hall said. Republicans said they were also worried that business owners who cater to weddings could face consequences if they refuse on moral grounds to do business with gay couples.

It has been a long road for gay Minnesotans seeking the right to get married.

The state Supreme Court ruled against gay marriage back in 1971. In 1997, when the Legislature was under Democratic control, lawmakers strengthened that prohibition by overwhelmingly passing a “Defense of Marriage Act.”

By 2004, conservative activists were seeking an even stricter ban. Michele Bachmann, then a state senator, initiated a multi-year effort to put a constitutional gay marriage ban before voters statewide. It finally reached fruition in 2011, when Republicans in control of both legislative chambers voted the amendment onto the ballot.

The amendment failed by about 150,000 votes after a long and expensive campaign, on an Election Day that saw three other states vote affirmatively for gay marriage. Those results were widely seen as a turning point for gay marriage supporters after years of electoral setbacks nationwide.

“It was a very clear statement,” said Rep. Karen Clark, DFL-Minneapolis, the bill’s chief House sponsor. Gay marriage is now legal in nine U.S. states, and a bill to legalize it in Illinois is moving through that state’s Legislature.

But the amendment’s defeat left gay marriage still illegal under existing Minnesota statute. With the governor’s office and Legislature under Democratic control after the 2012 election, gay marriage backers had the optimal political landscape for their push.

The bill’s chief Senate sponsor, Minneapolis Democrat Scott Dibble, rejected the idea that the amendment campaign pivoted on whether the gay marriage ban should be in the constitution.

“The conversation was, ‘What is marriage all about? Why does marriage matter?’ We argued that marriage is for everyone, freedom is for everyone, love is love and a commitment is for a lifetime,” Dibble said. “My sense is that Minnesotans have come so far, so fast on this issue and the Legislature is ready to settle this question and move on.”

Dibble said he doesn’t yet know if the votes are there to pass the bill, but added, “I think we’re close.” House and Senate committees plan hearings in March; final votes could come in April or May.

—The Associated Press contributed to this report.


By using this website’s user-contribution features, including comments, photo galleries, or any other feature, you agree to abide by the terms of use. Please read this agreement in its entirety because it contains useful information that will help you better understand the rules and general "good manners" that are expected when contributing content to this website.

Sign in to Comment | Need help commenting? Click here

Editor's Picks