Officer shot pit bull; owner confused

Published 10:29am Monday, December 3, 2012

The owner of a pit bull is confused after an officer shot his dog Sunday morning following a fiasco that reportedly started with another dog chasing a bicyclist.

Police went to the intersection of 11th Street and 11th Avenue NW at about 8:30 a.m. when they received two calls about a bicyclist cornered by a St. Bernard. When the officer arrived, the St. Bernard ran. The officer went into a neighborhood where he heard barking in a backyard. While the officer walked near a home with an open gate, he then saw a man, Ben Clennon, opening a door and a pit bull charging from the home. The officer reportedly shot the pit bull in the face as it charged and jumped at him.

Clennon said he was about 10 feet from the dog and officer when the officer shot the dog.

“I was just completely shocked at what happened,” he said.

Clennon loaded the dog into his truck, as the officer immediately advised to take the dog to the Austin Veterinary Clinic. At the vet clinic, Clennon thought he signed paperwork to allow vets to help his dog, as the dog was still able to walk and respond to Clennon. However, Clennon actually signed paperwork to allow the vets to euthanize his dog.

“I didn’t know they were putting my dog down until they told me he was gone,” Clennon said. “I was just kind of an empty shell standing there.”

Clennon added he doesn’t blame the officer for reacting and shooting the dog; however, he wishes the officer would have used less than lethal force instead of drawing his weapon and firing in a neighborhood. Clennon said he is glad the bullet hit the dog instead of ricocheting or possibly hitting something or someone else.

The owner of the St. Bernard, who is a tenant at the same house where Clennon lives, was cited for having a potentially dangerous dog at large. Clennon has not been charged with anything, and the police report has been forwarded to the city attorney.


Sign in to Comment | Need help commenting? Click here

  • hwystar53

    Yet another case of wreckless abandon for public safety by the Austin police!

    Report comment

  • http://www.facebook.com/kathleen.knott3 Kathleen Knott
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cheryl-Huerta/654958567 Cheryl Huerta

    Insane. That is the only word I can think of to describe what I’ve just read.

    Report comment

  • kevin

    If a large dog comes running out of a house loose and charges at me and jumps at me, it is getting shot. If this reporting is accurate the officer did nothing wrong. The owner could have been sited for not controlling his animal.

    Report comment

    • Hybrid21

      And if you did it with a person standing 10 feet or less from the dog and you were anyone other than a police officer, you would go to jail. In Memphis this week, a police officer was shot by another police officer who ‘fired at a loose dog in a house’, completely missing the dog and hitting the officer instead. Apparently, since the dog was not shot and still didn’t attack after a weapon was discharged in close proximity to the dog, the whole situation could’ve rightly been avoided. The incidents of police firing on dogs in neighborhoods and in close proximity to the public is increasing drastically and we’ll continue to see #’s of people being injured by this unless our Police depts. wake up and realize that part of their job will always entail dealing with dogs they don’t know and therefore they need to invest training police officers on how to deal with these situations and use critical thinking during the moment instead of drawing a gun as a first reaction. People’s safety are at stake here.

      Report comment

      • http://www.facebook.com/tzabel1 Terry Zabel

        How do you know you would go to jail for defending yourself against a charging dog? You cite a case where an officer got shot by another officer. Which is more common? An officer getting shot by another officer or someone getting bit by a charging dog?

        Report comment

  • 123tl78

    Sad story.

    Report comment

  • disqus_7VQ5nhD7Wn

    The key here is the amount of force. I understand the police officer responding to a dog approaching them. However, it would have been safer for everyone involved if he had used mace instead. This home owner did nothing wrong. He was taking his dog out to the back yard. The officer happened to approach and it was a matter of bad timing.

    Report comment

  • http://www.facebook.com/Novali Mandi Save Lennox Merlenbach

    Why is no one saying anything about the vets that euthanized the dog without telling the owner? He thought they were going to try and save him? Did they just stick papers in front of him and not explain anything? Irresponsible vet clinics should be shut down.

    Report comment

  • plumbing101mike

    Open and shut case. The owner can be very happy and relieved that his dog did not damage the officer before the officer took care of him. That could have been a friend or a mailman or a meter reader or or or – the list is long. Good thing it was somebody with a gun who knew how to use it!

    Report comment

    • http://www.facebook.com/maria.m.diaz.96 Maria Morgan Diaz

      If you knew this dog, you would know that wasn’t even a possibility….. Think he would have shot it if it was a black lab or a golden retriever? Yet both are put down everyday for being aggressive and vicious.

      Report comment

      • http://www.facebook.com/tzabel1 Terry Zabel

        If it wasn’t a possibility why isn’t Mr. Clennon disputting the action the dog took?

        Report comment

    • Bengt Fornberg

      The usual gratuitous shooting. Open and shut case, correct.

      Report comment

  • bill braske

    If it had been a lab or something it wouldnt have even made the article. Cop should be held accountable too. Reckless to say the least.

    Report comment

  • Ryan Norton
  • offthebag dotcom

    Confused? As to why you own a vicious weapon such as a pit bull? If you don’t dispute the actions of the officer then you are agreeing the dog was attacking him. You own one you live with the consequences. Don’t like it? Buy a Yorkie.

    Report comment

  • soapbox

    Well the first thing that I would like to say is, that I do not believe in “bad dog” breeds. I believe in “bad owners”. The problem is that most people who own a pit pull are “bad owners”. I think any dog could be bad if it is not trained and cared for the right way. A pit bull needs extra close training and care because if it trends towards a more aggressive side it will be very harmful to public safety. If you did a poor job of training a yorkie or some other little lap dog it would not be dangerous it would just bark a lot and make and make the people who live by you mad……. the thing is we have to many dirtballs in this town who buy a pit bull because they think it will make them look cool or tough with this hip hop generation of lazy slackers and it makes all pit bulls and pit bull owners look bad. we need to change the city code on who can own a dog and who can have breeding rights of dogs in our city.

    Report comment

  • ruth

    why would the vets give him papers authorizing putting the dog down if he was responsive and walking?

    Report comment

  • Melanie Urban

    God bless this police officer for his dignified assumption. I love peace and safety!! Hurrah!

    Report comment

Editor's Picks